|
INDUSTRY NEWS
Metrology
start-ups, spin-offs turned up business in downturn
 |
| GOOD
AS GOLD: Qcept's contact potential difference imaging technology can
detect less than a monolayer of material. The raised areas in the
wafer map (inset) represent areas of deposited gold on a 100-mm silicon
wafer. Graph shows gold surface concentration and sensor output voltage
data. |
So, here's the big
picture: a flabby national economy, an industry barely out of a prolonged
slump, a transition to a larger wafer size, transistor shrinks, the introduction
of new process materials. In other words, it's a great time to be a semiconductor
equipment supplier, right?
Some vendors
plying their trade in metrology and advanced process control (APC) certainly
hope so. Although it seems counterintuitive, it's a truism that when the
industry's notorious roller-coaster business cycle heads for the dips,
chipmakers actually have the time and, more important, the inclination
to return phone calls.
" In this industry it・s always the case that during downturns the
fabs redeploy people from production to developing the processes, optimizing
them, and getting them ready for the next upturn," says Lee Smith,
CEO of Oraxion, a Southern California–based start-up. "It's
easier to get customers' attention during a downturn."
Allen Vance, senior vice president at Qcept Technologies in Atlanta, says
the fledgling firm has had success setting up meetings to demonstrate
its new nondestructive metrology method. "We've gotten the meetings
we wanted to have with yield management and process people." Vance
notes that Qcept has managed to meet 13 of the 15 potential clients the
company contacted.
A developer of a wafer-temperature measurement system has also benefited
from the recent downturn. "It gave us the opportunity to work more
closely with our customers to develop new applications," says Rod
Browning, president and CEO of three-year-old OnWafer Technologies.
Of course, you can
have your foot in the door, but you still must have something worth buying.
With yields always uppermost in the minds of chipmaking executives, metrology
and APC firms are likely to find the welcome mat out more often than not.
In addition, a number of metrology start-ups and new spin-offs may benefit
from the "convergence" of factors cited above, as Oraxion's
Smith puts it. In interviews, they say that their tools are attracting
the attention of device manufacturers and OEMs alike.
In OnWafer's case, Browning says the company・s wireless SensorWafers
measure temperatures nonintrusively and give a clear picture of what・s
actually happening on the surface of product wafers during processing.
Accompanying OnView software is designed to collect data from the wafers'
in situ sensors. The SensorWafers collect data in real time and download
the information using an infrared link, the company says.
In late 2002 Browning left KLA-Tencor to join OnWafer, which had been
cofounded two years earlier by Costas Spanos, a professor of electrical
engineering and computer science at the University of California, Berkeley.
"Basically, at that point they had developed these wafer-based wireless
sensors for photolithography and plasma etch applications, and were using
them to get never-before-seen process data."
At the time, he notes, "people were struggling with critical dimensions
as they were trying to advance through the 100-nm node, and even having
difficulty yielding at 130 nm. Having applications in the pattern-transfer
area (litho and etch) seemed the perfect place to be. The key question
was, could we use this novel metrology approach, which 'sees what's happening
on the wafer surface' to help optimize the process?"
As effective as sensors are for gathering data, though, "if you can't
do something with the data, you can・t really optimize your process,"
Browning points out. As they developed new software applications and he
saw that the technology could actually accomplish that goal, he was sold.
"I think that's really when we finally said this is going to work."
OnWafer essentially doubled its revenues last year and expects "to more
than double revenues this year," Browning says. "Our primary focus is
in pattern transfer to improve critical dimension and CD uniformity."
Business has been so good that the firm counts as customers "nearly all
the top 25" major chipmakers. The company recently moved to larger quarters
in the east San Francisco Bay Area suburb of Dublin.
Oraxion is another metrology launch with roots in academia. The company・s
CGS series of inspection tools is based on technologies developed in the
1990s by a California Institute of Technology professor working on U.S.
Department of Defense research in the area of "ballistics impact in materials,"
explains Smith, the start-up's chief executive. The technology—coherent
gradient sensing (CGS)—is "a type of interferometry that is new
in the semiconductor industry."
The technology remained lab bound until 1999, when the Massachusetts Institute
of Technology became involved in the research effort, and the idea that
the technology could apply to semiconductor manufacturing began to take
hold. Caltech contacted Idealab, a high-tech incubator based in Pasadena,
CA, for venture funds, says Smith. The company was launched early in 2002.
Was it a hard sell or did the technology sell itself? "Largely, the latter,"
Smith replies. "The company was formed in March 2002. In December of that
year it shipped a prototype to International Sematech, and this coming
summer it・s shipping its first product." The fully automated tool, the
CGS300 wafer-inspection and defect-prediction metrology system, will be
sent to "a flagship 300-mm fab in the United States. That makes it two
and a half years from inception to installation."
"There is a convergence between this technique and a need that・s been
developing in the industry, accelerated by the 200- to 300-mm conversion,"
Smith says. "The wafers got bigger in diameter, but the thickness changed
little." Mechanical instabilities processed into this "large platter are
sitting there waiting to spring forward. We think of a silicon wafer now
as a spring. All it takes is something to trigger it to assume a distorted
shape of lower energy . . . in order to relieve some of the stresses that
are put on it. And processing delivers those triggers big time in the
form of nonuniformities in heating rates, cooling rates, and lack of axial
symmetry in all kinds of processes, like chemical-mechanical polishing.
"Because features are getting so small, they are more fragile and easily
damaged by these wafer distortions," Smith adds. Large process lines "may
have 400 steps, and 100 of them may be thermal cycles." The "spring effects"
cause nonuniformities that deform the wafer "into a potato chip," Smith
jokes.
The hundreds of microns of "nonflatness" that can develop are certainly
no laughing matter. Smith lists the potential problems: vias pull out,
interconnect lines crack, low-k dielectrics crack, films delaminate, STI
leaks, strained Si has control issues, etc. The industry trends point
only to smaller features with less and less tolerance for stress-driven
wafer distortion, a trend that demands better process control," the executive
says. Oraxion claims that its in-line production monitoring tool enables
fabs to understand and monitor the buildup of deleterious stress in product
wafers for the first time ever.
Nonuniformity issues across the wafer also are the focus of Qcept Technologies'
new offering. Based on technology licensed from the Georgia Institute
of Technology, the company has developed a tool to measure chemical nonuniformities
on semiconductor wafers. The technology, called contact potential difference
imaging, measures spatial variations in work function that correlate directly
to variations in the wafer・s surface chemistry, the company says.
Integrated
into the tabletop Chemetriq tool, the scanning metrology system is capable
of scanning a 200-mm wafer, either patterned or bare, in less than 5 minutes.
Qcept expects to sell its first commercial version of the Chemetriq tool
in April, says Vance. The tool works with copper processes, CMP, and different
cleaning chemistries, because the start-up is trying to embrace as many
applications as possible, the company's senior vice president explains.
"We're initially looking to deliver this system in an R&D environment
as a tabletop tool, but we believe this technology has a place in advanced
process control in the fab," he emphasizes. He adds that the operating
speed that enables the Chemetriq to rapidly assess chemistry uniformity
is a big selling point. "Obviously, throughput is key."
HyperNex in State College, PA, is a metrology spin-off also looking to
position itself during the chip industry's long-awaited upswing. Originally
a research arm of ATMI, the venture specializes in x-ray diffraction analysis.
In February 2001, it signed an agreement with IBM to perfect its wide-angle
x-ray diffraction technology for copper processing.
The start-up has developed an automated 300-mm system, the AutoTex, incorporating
crystallographic microstructure analysis for advanced fabs. Damascene
copper processing is particularly prone to problems associated with stress
migration, electromigration, defects, and resistivity. Polycrystalline
device layers such as barriers and metal lines can hammer both device
yield and performance, the company emphasizes, adding that yield ramps
in copper production lines, particularly at the 130-nm node and below,
are more punishing than they・ve ever been. The company touts its new
system as a fast-working alternative to off-line tools used for examining
crystallographic microstructure performance during processing.
Dave Kurtz, the company president who has a background in material science,
notes that raising money to get a system into the marketplace, especially
"in this demanding environment," is tough. It's particularly difficult
when you・re trying to accomplish this "in a cost-effective way and get
to a level of profitability without spending a fortune."
The metrology segment of the market faces more of a challenge today than
it did 10 years ago, "and certainly more than it did 20 years ago," Kurtz
asserts. A tabletop analytical tool was more likely to find a spot on
a fab manager's order list back in the day. "Today, it's a significant
challenge. I won・t give you numbers, but you can imagine the amount of
venture capital investment it takes to fully develop and put something
in a fab."
Why even try
then? Kurtz chuckles and answers only half in jest, "Sometimes you're
naive enough to not know what you're up against." A development as "disruptive"
as the introduction of copper damascene, however, creates opportunities
for spin-offs such as HyperNex, because "it presents new issues for both
the process and metrology."
Kurtz says the amount of cash needed to develop instrumentation or process
gear is "very substantial. A number like $15 million or $25 million is
not uncommon in this industry, and look at the amount of business you
need to earn that back. I think we're unique in that we・ve done quite
a bit with quite a little."
HyperNex has been able to parlay U.S. Small Business Innovation Research
program support and Defense Department–based research into a government-backed
success story. The help "enabled us to create expertise and an infrastructure
that we could then translate into a commercial effort. It did not directly
pay for our product, but it gave us that base expertise and infrastructure."
Kurtz factors into this developmental calculus the belief that the process
equipment segment has a higher reward potential than its metrology counterpart.
Process OEMs compete, and one technology will win out and the other will
lose out, he argues. "But the one that wins, wins big. Metrology doesn・t
quite work that way." One metrology tool might be accepted in one part
of the chip business and another measurement and monitoring solution in
another segment, he says.
With that in mind, Kurtz, like the other executives here, agrees that
the recent downturn gave companies such as his the opportunity to lay
the groundwork for bigger payoffs down the road. As Browning of OnWafer
says, "The slowness of the industry enabled us to flesh out early."

MicroHome |
Search | Current Issue | MicroArchives
Buyers Guide | Media Kit
Questions/comments about MICRO Magazine? E-mail us at cheynman@gmail.com.
© 2007 Tom Cheyney
All rights reserved.
|