Bijan
Moslehi, PhD, is chief technology officer and senior
vice president, semiconductor technology research, for the Noblemen
Group (www.noblemengroup. com), a boutique investment banking, strategic
advisory, and business development firm based in San Diego, Silicon
Valley, and Portland, OR. Moslehi has some 20 years' experience working
in the semiconductor and semiconductor equipment industries, including
stints with Hewlett-Packard, VLSI Technology, Philips, National Semiconductor,
Fairchild Semiconductor, Applied Materials, KLA-Tencor, and Mattson.
He can be reached at bmoslehi@noblemengroup.com.
Semiconductor
manufacturing technology has entered a new and exciting era that promises
to provide significant productivity and cost benefits. But this new
age of chipmaking will have its share of severe challenges as well.
Over the past few years, there has been slow but steady progress toward
e-manufacturing, which encompasses advanced process control/advanced
equipment control (APC/AEC) and e-diagnostics. Many technical, operational,
economic, and business factors are driving this trend. Paramount among
these are shrinking process windows and process control requirements
for critical processes at the 90-nm technology node and beyond, the
transition to 300-mm wafers and the challenges of processing the higher-valued
substrates, rising manufacturing costs, and the quest for higher productivity.
The
benefits of e-manufacturing have been well documented, widely recognized,
and proven. They include significant reductions in costs, cycle times,
process variances, rework rates, scrap, test wafers, and tool downtime.
Other benefits are increased fab throughput, yield, device performance
and speed, process capability (Cp and Cpk), tool uptime, tool utilization,
and speed of capacity/yield ramps. Optimized tool-to-tool matching,
work in process (WIP), tool and process qualifications, and preventive
maintenance (PM) schedules have been added advantages.
Various
APC point solutions have been developed and implemented by IC manufacturers,
focusing on feedback and feedforward run-to-run (R2R) control as well
as fault detection and classification (FDC). As defined by The
International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS), R2R
control maintains product quality by adjusting critical process parameters
that control systematic tool and process variations and excursions
(i.e., course corrections). With FDC, sensors respond to equipment
problems by identifying faults and triggering action for equipment
repairs or PMs (i.e., tool health monitoring and fault management).
Integrated metrology sensors have been pushed for real-time APC with
wafer-to-wafer process control and FDC with real-time fault detection
and management capabilities.
Adoption
of these new concepts requires a comprehensive understanding of the
needs, costs, and benefits on an application-by-application basis.
In theory, all processes could potentially benefit from APC, but it
is prudent to initially focus on a few critical applications that
absolutely require such controls. So far, APC has been successfully
and broadly incorporated with integrated metrology primarily in the
highly variable CMP process. Over the next few years, advanced controls
will be applied to critical steps in lithography (CD, overlay), etch
(CD, gate resist trimming, chamber matching), and copper damascene
interconnect (resistance control), particularly in 300-mm fabs and
other plants running sub-90-nm processes.
The
drive toward e-manufacturing is complemented by advances in automated
product flow and management. A new generation of fabwide interbay
and intrabay automated material-handling systems has been introduced
into 300-mm fabs. They offer direct tool-to-tool delivery capability
with distributed local buffers and are supported by advanced real-time
material control systems software. Once integrated into a fab's computer-integrated
manufacturing network, such automation systems will essentially turn
future 300-mm facilities into giant virtual processing clusters. These
capabilities will create intriguing possibilities that previously
have been practically impossible. Unique opportunities will arise
for innovative fab and tool layout designs, novel methods of managing
the product and process flow, and true facilitywide integrated yield
management and real-time APC/AEC systems. One example is the ability
to link competitors' tools into modular virtual clusters, such as
the photo-metrology/etch-metrology/ash-wet clean-metrology sequence.
However,
the goal of a "lights-out fab," which is supposed to eliminate people
in fabs, remains premature and unrealistic, and will not be achievable
in the foreseeable future. Many elements of the dispositioning and
decision-making process can be automated in response to an out-of-control
event. However, rigid automation will not be as adaptable as fab engineers
and operators, who interpret complex fab information and process data,
and decide the proper subsequent course of action. In addition, the
reliability of current tools and fab systems is far below what would
be required to even start to think about the notion of a true lights-out
fab.
Despite
its significant cost and productivity benefits, e-manufacturing still
has a long road ahead. Even with recent limited deployments, the general
industry perspective is that e-diagnostics has yet to deliver on its
promise. The complexities of e-manufacturing technologies, combined
with infrastructure gaps and strategic issues, have led to major implementation
delays and other setbacks. Slow progress in developing standards and
concerns about data and IP security have greatly contributed to these
interruptions. Current fab tools lack the necessary communication
links and access to internal tool and process data for effective APC
implementations. In fact, some tools still fail even standard SECS-GEM
tests. There is an urgent need for timely plug-and-play equipment
communication and interface standards with an open architecture. Improved
data quality, data encryption, firewalls, and virtual private networks
(VPN) are needed for resolving data and IP security issues.
Substantial
performance improvements in the CMP module have led to a strong interest
in the implementation of real-time APC using integrated metrology
in lithography and etch. However, current applications are still primarily
limited to macrodefect inspection and resist-trimming steps. Compounding
the difficulties are the very slow adoption of integrated metrology
and its small niche-market status. Many suppliers have yet to achieve
an acceptable return on investment for their years of effort in this
area.
In
fact, the broader implementation and deployment of integrated metrology
has effectively been pushed out to beyond the 90-nm node. Integrated
metrology systems that meet the demanding sensitivity, throughput,
reliability, and performance requirements, under such harsh tool and
process environmental conditions as vibration and temperature, are
still immature and in many cases need to be proven and field tested.
In addition, current sensors do not address the needs of many new
and emerging materials and processes.
Difficulties
and problems with designing integrated metrology into process tools
have also taken several years to resolve. Some OEMs have chosen to
offer an open tool concept, providing a standard interface that accommodates
integrated metrology from different suppliers. Other toolmakers use
a closed architecture. The ongoing battle for the "ownership" of the
format, flow, and management of the data among tool, sensor, and software
solution suppliers has had implications for fabwide, real-time APC
strategy. The prospect of working with two or more suppliers to maintain
a tool goes against the desires of most fabs, which prefer to deal
with a sole vendor. The integration and interfacing of various components
often have been very painful.
For
e-manufacturing to be successfully implemented, an open fabwide APC
framework for plug-and-play; availability of and compliance with standards;
suitable tool and process sensors; access to relevant sensor data;
and seamless integration of hardware, software, and tool/process models
must take place. The entire chipmaking community needs to get behind
the ongoing efforts by those industry groups working on these issues,
such as International Sematech's e-manufacturing/e-diagnostics initiative
and SEMI standards.