|
Developing
supercritical carbon dioxide processing in microelectronics applications
Christopher
Case, BOC Edwards; and James McClain, Micell Integrated Systems
The
fabrication of integrated circuits includes many cleaning steps.
For example, 125 such steps can be required to manufacture a typical 180-nm
circuit. Cleaning challenges increase as feature sizes decrease. Hence
water-based cleans do not always reach small, high-aspect-ratio features,
and their residues are difficult to remove completely. In addition, drying
wafers after water-based cleans can damage mechanically weak structures
such as MEMS devices and porous low-k dielectrics.
 |
| Figure
1: SEM images of 150-nm isolated lines with a 6:1 aspect ratio that
(a) have collapsed during traditional aqueous cleaning, and (b) have
been maintained during processing using an inverse microemulsion formulation
in supercritical CO2. (Samples provided by IBM
Thomas J. Watson Research Center.) |
To
meet the challenges posed by shrinking feature sizes, the semiconductor
industry has turned to the use of supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2)
in microelectronics cleaning applications. In contrast to aqueous cleans,
scCO2 has low viscosity and negligible surface tension,
so that the smallest structures can be protected from the damage associated
with surface tension and capillary forces. At the same time, scCO2's
gaslike properties facilitate its removal, obviating residue concerns.
The effect of using a standard aqueous-based chemistry versus an scCO2
formulation to remove residues from fragile structures is highlighted
in Figure 1.
This
article discusses the practical implementation of scCO2
technology and reviews the results from copper and postash residue-removal
tests.
The
Use of scCO2 in IC Cleaning Processes
Above
certain pressures and temperatures, some materials do not experience a
distinct phase change; they are in a supercritical state. Their molecules
are too close together to form a gas, and at sufficiently high temperatures,
the energy of the molecules is so great that the materials cannot condense
into a liquid. Carbon dioxide, water, and propane are examples of materials
that have widely studied supercritical phases.
CO2
becomes supercritical at a relatively low temperature of 31°C and
pressure of 75 bar. At those levels, it has liquidlike density, with very
low viscosity and negligible surface tension. In addition, because scCO2
is the second-most abundant and second-least costly solvent known, it
is expected to play a crucial role in difficult and delicate clean and
dry operations in the future. Consequently, a discussion of supercritical
processing was incorporated into the 2001 edition of The International
Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) as a possible
solution for cleaning challenges in interconnect technology and MEMS devices.1
Less recognized, but equally important, is the need to develop nonaqueous
processes for problem materials such as germanium alloys and compound
semiconductors.
Process
steps in which scCO2 is thought to be particularly
advantageous include:
• Lithographic
image development.
• Postdevelop
photoresist drying.
•
Postetch and postash cleaning of high-aspect-ratio structures.
•
Postetch and postash cleaning of porous low-k structures.
•
Cleaning, postclean drying, postclean lubrication, and etching of MEMS
devices.
•
Barrier layer and seed layer metal deposition.
•
Porous ultra-low-k film formation.
•
Compound semiconductor device metal lift-off.
Unlike
water, CO2 has no dipole moment and is not ionically
active. Thus, very few substances spontaneously dissolve into CO2.
To remove postash residue from wafer vias, for example, it is necessary
to add appropriate chemistries to scCO2. While the
addition of polar cosolvents yields a homogenous solution of increased
polarity, cosolvent concentrations of <20% do not support ionic dissociation
and solvation. Moreover, at higher concentrations, the process advantages
of scCO2 are lost. Therefore, specifically formulated
surfactants can be added in small amounts to CO2
to perform postetch or postash residue removal and metal cleaning. As
illustrated in Figure 2, such surfactants create a nanometer-scale heterogeneous
system of discrete polar microdomains dispersed in a continuous phase
of nonpolar CO2.2 These discrete domains
of microemulsions are often based on aqueous solutions, or on water itself.
 |
| Figure
2: Design of surfactants and the formation of micelles in scCO2:
(a) CO2-philic structure, (b) CO2-phobic
structure, and (c) micelles. |
Water-in-CO2
microemulsions were first explored in the early 1990s.3,4 The
surfactants added to CO2 have a polar head group
that points inward and a CO2-philic tail that forms
what are known as reverse micelles, which remove process residues.
The polar domains in the microemulsion serve two important functions.
First, they provide the medium for solvation and removal of water-soluble
polar contaminants. (Experimental results show that >80% of postash
residues can be removed with pure water-in-CO2 microemulsions.)
Second, they deliver the active chemistry that removes the rest of the
residues.
In
contrast to the chemistry system deployed in CO2,
an everyday surfactant such as laundry detergent contains oleophilic segments
that enhance water's ability to solvate oily matter and hydrophilic portions
that isolate the oily contaminant microscopically. In order to perform
CO2-based wafer cleans, active chemicals, analogous
to those used in commercial cleaners, are modified to be compatible with
CO2. Typical aqueous-based commercial cleaners contain
one or more active chemicals, such as acids, bases, chelants, etchants,
and oxidants. Research has concluded that water-in-CO2
microemulsion systems that contain one or more of these active chemistries
are highly effective at removing residues rapidly and completely.
Processing
Tests and Results
In
scCO2 tests, chemistry formulations for specific
processes were first optimized using wafer fragments and a 5–25-ml
laboratory apparatus called a view cell, which is equipped with sapphire
windows allowing investigators to view the interior. It has been shown
that formulations created in the view cell work similarly in 200-mm single-wafer
processors as long as processing pressures, temperatures, and times are
the same. Regardless of chamber size, scCO2 processing
equipment is generally configured as shown in Figure 3. Chemistries are
injected into pressurized CO2 because the solubility
of the chemical adjuncts is typically a function of pressure.
 |
Figure
3: Schematic drawing of scCO2 processing equipment.
|
Copper
Cleaning. In damascene processing, copper ions are present on the
surfaces of dielectric sidewalls and on top of Cu(0) lines after the bottom
barrier has been etched away. Known as post-breakthrough, this
ion residue is removed using aqueous cleaning processes that employ a
suite of chemicals to enhance their solubility. It is critical to remove
these residues in interconnect processing because they directly affect
yields.
 |
| Figure
4: Photograph of 2-mg/ml copper ions effectively dissolved in scCO2
after treatment with a water-in-CO2 reverse
microemulsion. |
The
ability of microemulsions to solubilize copper contamination in scCO2
can be demonstrated visually. In one experiment, an oxidized copper complex—Cu(II)—was
placed in a small, open pan in a view cell. The view cell was then closed
and pressurized to 2500 psi at 40°C. The clear, colorless scCO2
solution, visible through the window, remained unchanged under these conditions.
The experiment was then repeated with a CO2-philic
surfactant and a water microemulsion, which were placed in a separate
pan adjacent to the copper salt. The CO2 turned
green within one minute because of the presence of Cu(II) species in solution.
The solution continued to change over the course of 3 minutes until it
was deep green in color, at which time all of the copper complex had been
dissolved. The results of the experiment are shown in Figure 4. The microemulsion
formulation containing 2% surfactant and 17 mol of water per mole of surfactant
rapidly solubilized 2 mg of Cu(II) complex per ml of scCO2,
representing a solubility level approximately six orders of magnitude
larger than that of unmodified scCO2.
After
it had been demonstrated that microemulsions can solubilize oxidized copper,
processes were developed to remove etch residues. First, three blanket
copper wafers supplied by International Sematech were exposed to etch
stop breakthrough gas (C4F8/O2)
to generate oxidized copper residues. Then the wafers were processed using
either a commercial wet cleaning agent or two different CO2-based
microemulsions.
| Wafer State |
Atomic
Concentration (%) |
| Copper |
Fluorine |
Oxygen |
Carbon |
| As received |
0 |
22 |
13 |
65 |
| After wet clean |
16 |
9 |
23 |
52 |
| After
CO2 clean |
41 |
11 |
30 |
19 |
|
| Table
I: XPS analysis results comparing copper concentrations on the surface
of a wafer as received, after a wet clean, and after two different
CO2-based microemulsion cleans. Higher copper
concentrations indicate that more residue is being cleaned. |
X-ray
photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis results, presented in Table
I, reveal that after breakthrough etch, only fluorine, oxygen, and carbon
were present on the surface. No copper residue was present. After the
wafers were cleaned, copper appeared on the surface while the fluorine
peak decreased, signifying that the wafers were being cleaned. Significantly,
the wafers cleaned with the scCO2-based solvents
had higher copper levels than the wafer cleaned with the commercial agent.
The depth profiles in Figure 5, which compare atomic concentrations on
the as-received wafer and those on one of the CO2-cleaned
samples, clearly demonstrate that copper residues can be removed using
scCO2-based microemulsions.
 |
| Figure
5: XPS depth-profile analysis showing concentration versus sputter
time for (a) the as-received sample, and (b) a CO2-cleaned
sample. |
Postbarrier
Breakthrough Cleaning and Residue Removal. It is somewhat more complicated
to optimize postash residue-removal processes than copper cleaning processes.
The chemical nature of postash residue depends on the interaction between
the dielectric and the photoresist and etch gases. Baseline processes
have been developed for the most common spin-on and plasma-enhanced chemical
vapor deposition dielectrics.
To
illustrate the effectiveness of scCO2-based solvents
in postash cleaning processes, post-breakthrough cleans were performed
on patterned wafers containing two different low-k spin-on materials:
JSR 5109 from JSR (Tokyo) and dense and porous SiLK from Dow Chemical
(Midland, MI). Initially, no microemulsions were formed, since active
chemistries, including acids, bases, etchants, and oxidizers, were mixed
with scCO2 without the addition of surfactants.
The chemistries had been screened for their ability to clean wafers containing
the low-k materials. Microscopic inspection showed that none of the formulations
effectively removed visible residues from the post-breakthrough samples.
However, when water-in-CO2 microemulsions composed
solely of water and a surfactant were tested, better cleaning results
were achieved. Judging by the volume of residue material removed, the
microemulsions appeared to be roughly 80% effective. Achieving optimal
cleanliness, however, requires the addition of active chemicals.
To
determine the effectiveness of scCO2 processing,
device structures on a wafer containing JSR 5109 dielectric and post-breakthrough
structures were compared before cleaning, after cleaning with a process
of record (POR) aqueous solvent, and after cleaning with a water-in-CO2
microemulsion containing active chemistry.5 The results of
this test are presented in Figure
6. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) image in Figure 6a of the
as-received wafer sample shows granular residues on the floor and lower
wall of the via and a white residue band halfway up the via wall. The
z-contrast transmission electron microscope (TEM) image in Figure 6b of
the as-received wafer clearly shows copper-containing residues on the
lower half of the via wall. The SEM image in Figure 6c of the aqueous-cleaned
sample shows that all residues were removed from the via floor but that
some remained on the wall. The TEM image of the same sample in Figure
6d shows that all residues were removed from the via floor but that contamination
remained on the via sidewalls. The SEM image in Figure 6e of the sample
cleaned using a water-in-CO2 microemulsion also
shows that virtually all residues were removed without copper overetch
and CD loss in the low-k dielectric. This test and comparable tests involving
other dielectrics indicate that properly formulated CO2
microemulsions are at least as effective as aqueous cleans at cleaning
postash residues.
System
Needs of CO2-Based Processing
Since
CO2 becomes supercritical at a pressure level of
75 bar, the implementation of supercritical technology requires wafer
processing in pressure vessels. In addition, the implementation of supercritical
CO2-based processes requires the development of
new materials delivery and processing systems. In recent years, specialized
scCO2 pressure equipment and processes have been
developed for microelectronics applications. The first production-worthy
units are moving from the lab to the fab.
A schematic
diagram of a production-scale CO2 system is shown
in Figure 7. Liquid carbon dioxide can be supplied either from a cooled
bulk tank or from a room-temperature container such as a cylinder. The
pressure of the liquid is increased to the supercritical regime, typically
3000 psi, with a pump. Because the solubility of chemicals in CO2
is a function of pressure, chemicals are usually introduced into pressurized
liquid CO2. The pressurized mixtures are stored
in accumulators, vessels capable of delivering requisite quantities of
CO2 into a processing chamber at high flow rates.
 |
| Figure
7: Schematic diagram of a production scale CO2
system. |
After
the process has been completed, the chamber cannot be depressurized directly,
because pressure-dependent solubility can cause additives to deposit on
the wafer. Instead, the chamber is purged at the processing pressure with
pure CO2, a lengthy procedure for which alternative
technologies have been developed to decrease the cycle time.
Liquid
CO2 is discharged from the processing vessel into
a pressure vessel known as a separator, which separates the chemistries
from the CO2. Cost-of-ownership calculations indicate
that in a typical fab situation, a cost-effective implementation of the
technology requires that CO2 be recycled, as illustrated
in Figure 7. Recycled CO2 vapor is purified by distillation
and supplemented with new liquid in the purifier.
CO2
purity requirements for supercritical processing are unknown; no published
studies causally link processing results with CO2
purity. The starting grade of 99.9% (3N), known as beverage grade,
is readily available commercially. As the technology matures, critical
impurity levels will become better understood. If required, 3N purity
can be readily transformed into 5N.
The
processing chamber itself is a pressure vessel that must be engineered
and constructed according to applicable engineering codes. Since most
chamber designs accommodate a single wafer, cycle times must be kept as
short as possible. The volume of the single-wafer chamber must be small,
and the chamber closure and locking mechanism must be fast-acting. To
integrate postash cleaning with dry etch/ash processes, high-pressure
tools should be compatible with vacuum and controlled-atmosphere cluster
tools.
Conclusion
Microelectronics
processing with supercritical fluids is moving from the lab to the fab.
Initially, the benefits of chemistry delivery by CO2
rather than by water were thought to be applicable strictly to low-k materials,
including specifically porous ones. That view is rapidly changing, however;
now the technology is considered valuable because it helps to avoid costs
generally associated with the removal of water in critical applications.
It is too early to predict the extent to which CO2-based
processing will penetrate microelectronics processing. Nevertheless, the
fabrication of some MEMS devices relies heavily on supercritical processes,
while silicon processing is clearly moving in that direction. Since device
dimensions will continue to shrink on a predictable schedule, either improved
drying processes will be required to combat water retention in fine structures,
or water will have to be avoided altogether.
References
1. The
International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (San Jose: SIA,
2001).
2. JB
McClain et al., "Design of Nonionic Surfactants for Supercritical Carbon
Dioxide," Science 274 (1996): 2049–2052.
3. JL
Fulton et al., "Aggregation of Amphiphilic Molecules in Supercritical
Carbon Dioxide: A Small Angle X-Ray Scattering Study," Langmuir 11
(1995): 4241–4249.
4. KP
Johnston et al., "Water-in-Carbon Dioxide Microemulsions: A New Environment
for Hydrophiles Including Proteins," Science 271 (1996): 624–626.
5. MI
Wagner et al., "Surfactant Enabled CO2 Cleaning
Processes for BEOL Applications: Post Barrier Breakthrough," in Proceedings
of the Electrochemical Society Meeting (Pennington, NJ: Electrochemical
Society, 2003), in press.
Christopher
Case, PhD, is chief technology officer at BOC
Edwards (Crawley, W. Sussex, UK). He chairs the ITRS interconnect
technology working group, collaborating closely with industry experts
to forecast IC trends. Before joining BOC Edwards, Case was an assistant
professor of engineering at Brown University (Providence, RI). He has
held positions at Solid State Solutions, Bell Labs, and International
Sematech. He received a master's degree from Université Bordeaux
in France and an ScB and PhD in engineering from Brown University in Providence,
RI. (Case can be reached at +44 1293 528844 or chris.case@bocedwards.com.)
James
McClain, PhD, is president and chief technical officer of Micell Technologies
and its subsidiary, Micell Integrated Systems (Raleigh, NC). He is responsible
for the direction of the company's work in the area of CO2-based
applications and is involved in applying its technologies to several aspects
of microelectronic processing. He received a BS in chemical engineering
from Lehigh University in Bethlehem, PA, and a PhD in chemistry from the
University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill. (McClain can be reached at
919/313-2111 or jmcclain@micell.com.)

MicroHome |
Search | Current Issue | MicroArchives
Buyers Guide | Media Kit
Questions/comments about MICRO Magazine? E-mail us at cheynman@gmail.com.
© 2007 Tom Cheyney
All rights reserved.
|