RequestLink
MICRO
Advertiser and
Product
Information

Buyer's Guide
Buyers Guide

tom
Chip Shots blog

Greatest Hits of 2005
Greatest Hits of 2005

Featured Series
Featured Series


Web Sightings

Media Kit

Comments? Suggestions? Send us your feedback.

 

MicroMagazine.com

INDUSTRY NEWS

Counting pennies

As the end of conventional planar CMOS scaling nears, chipmakers will need alternatives to traditional silicon substrates. Production of advanced logic ICs in particular will require new wafer technologies such as strained silicon, silicon-on-insulator (SOI), and multigate FETs. Naturally, the winning technology will depend to a great extent on cost.

SOURCE: INFINEON TECHBNOLOGIES, ILLUSTRATION BY JAMES SCHLESINGER

In a technical presentation at Semicon Europa 2003, Helmut Tews and three colleagues from Infineon Technologies focused on cost-benefit factors and other issues that will determine the successful new wafer types. The Munich-based Infineon team believes chipmakers will need to manufacture next-generation logic devices on something other than standard wafers.The pie chart here depicts the distribution of processing costs for a logic device using triple-oxide technology and six BEOL levels of copper. The metal levels make up a good portion of the costs, which include capital investment, cleanroom operations, cleanroom technicians, and materials. Mask and wafer costs are not included.

The chart divides processes into their FEOL and BEOL constituents. Tews says the team separated FEOL processing into "building blocks" beginning with shallow-trench isolation, shown as segment one. Typically, each block consists of a lithography step, an implantation step, cleans, and strips, he says. The number of implant levels depends on the number of different types of transistors on the chip. Contact holes, shown as number nine, mark the transition between FEOL and BEOL, notes Tews, adding "for many products BEOL is more expensive than FEOL."

Regarding production costs, Tews says chipmakers try to minimize the use of metal levels because they require very expensive lithography. A device manufacturer will switch to 2X metals—meaning the width of the metal layers is twice as large as 1X metals—as soon as possible. For the sake of their cost calculations, Tews and crew assumed two metal levels with 2X metals. Determining the number of 1, 2, and 4X levels requires striking a difficult balance between area request and processing costs, Tews says.

The winning wafer technology will need to be available when the industry is ready to jump to the next process node. The market ultimately will determine which device concepts and wafer types will emerge to keep the industry on the schedule dictated by the ITRS, the Infineon team concludes.


MicroHome | Search | Current Issue | MicroArchives
Buyers Guide | Media Kit

Questions/comments about MICRO Magazine? E-mail us at cheynman@gmail.com.

© 2007 Tom Cheyney
All rights reserved.