RequestLink
MICRO
Advertiser and
Product
Information

Buyer's Guide
Buyers Guide

tom
Chip Shots blog

Greatest Hits of 2005
Greatest Hits of 2005

Featured Series
Featured Series


Web Sightings

Media Kit

Comments? Suggestions? Send us your feedback.

 

MicroMagazine.com

Defect Analysis

Using VPD and magnetic sector
ICP-MS to characterize contaminants

David Palsulich, Kevin Coyle, and Larry Weston, Micron Technology

A combined sample preparation and analytical technique to detect contamination offers accurate results, low detection limits, and the confirmation of interfering peaks.

In semiconductor manufacturing, trace contamination on the wafer surface can have a negative impact on device lifetime, functionality, and performance. In response, a consortium of suppliers, researchers, and chip manufacturers have developed The International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, which sets levels for specific contaminants and overall surface contamination for the industry's evolving technology nodes. For example, the ≤7 x 109-atoms/cm2 level specified for critical elements for 2002 will drop to ≤3.4 x 109 atoms/cm2 in 2005, with a ≤1.7 x 109-atoms/cm2 specification predicted for 2016.1 To achieve such goals, manufacturers require cost-effective analytical instrumentation that produces accurate and efficient results at the lowest possible detection limit.

In the past, quadrupole inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) analysis has been sufficient for many low-level measurements, although interfering molecular species may compromise the accuracy of such results. At masses below mass-to-charge 80, ICP-MS has unit mass resolution, which makes the analyzer subject to several isotopic and polyatomic interferences at such mass levels. As the complexity of the matrix being analyzed increases, this phenomenon becomes an even greater concern. Combining the vapor phase decomposition (VPD) or drop scan etching sample preparation technique with magnetic sector high-resolution ICP-MS (HR-ICP-MS) can overcome this interference resolution problem.

Capable of detecting a range of elements, HR-ICP-MS not only offers low detection limits and a high degree of accuracy, it is less expensive than other surface techniques and can determine cleaning process efficiencies, chamber integrity, film integrity, and surface metallic contamination levels. After a brief discussion of surface analysis techniques and applications, this article reports on a study that demonstrates the detection capabilities of the combined VPD HR-ICP-MS technique for several critical semiconductor elements.

Surface Analysis Techniques for Ultratrace Detection of Metallic Contamination

Several techniques can be employed to identify wafer surface contamination and its source. However, the VPD technique combined with ICP-MS or total reflection x-ray spectrometry (TXRF) are the current methods of choice for ultratrace detection of surface metallic contamination.2 With VPD TXRF, elements ranging from sulfur through uranium with low detection limits and masses below 28 amu with higher detection limits can be analyzed. VPD ICP-MS offers better detection limits than TXRF for most analytes and also permits the analysis of critical semiconductor elements such as lithium, boron, aluminum, sodium, magnesium, and phosphorus. Moreover, VPD ICP-MS allows for direct calibration with certified standards. However, several groups have been working toward reconciling the standardization issues associated with TXRF instrumentation.3

The VPD ICP-MS process has been used in various research projects. In one study, it was used to determine the effects of plasma etching on silicon substrates. Before the analysis was conducted, it was generally believed that the primary concerns for the plasma etching process were wafer surface damage and crystal lattice disordering, physical effects that could be repaired by removing the damaged layer through hydrofluoric acid etch. The VPD ICP-MS tests indicated that etchers are also sources of heavy-metal contamination that could lead to a reduction in capacitor retention time and increased junction diode leakage.4

The VPD technique also is widely used for optimizing wet cleans by confirming the efficiency of contamination removal. An optimal wet clean results in a sufficient reduction of particle and metallic contamination levels while minimizing processing times and chemical and water use, leading to lower manufacturing costs. As much as 1500–2000 gal of ultrapure water are used to process each 200-mm wafer.5 As the industry continues its transition to 300-mm technologies, that amount will tend to increase. While efforts are being made to reduce processing times, water and chemical use, and the number of cleaning steps, it will be necessary to verify that contamination levels are not increasing.

Experimental Procedures

In the study reported here, all samples were prepared using VPD in a Class 10 cleanroom. The VPD scanning solution was collected in high-purity Teflon vessels that were precleaned with 10-ppt-grade chemicals.

All quantification was performed using the method of standard additions. For the trace elemental analyses of wafer surfaces, the VPD scanning solution was analyzed with an Element2 HR-ICP-MS from Thermo Finnigan MAT (Bremen, Germany) equipped with a microflow nebulizer. Of interest were the identification of polyatomic interferences, the resolution of such interferences, and the verification of high results. Microsampling technologies were used in an attempt to lower detection limits.

Table I shows the operating conditions for HR-ICP-MS that were found to be optimal for this project. Using cool (600-W) plasma enabled the investigators to perform analyses under a single set of plasma conditions while still obtaining good detection limits for typical hot plasma elements such as copper, nickel, and zinc. However, in certain experiments, 1200-W plasma tunes were used as well.

Parameter

Condition

Torch position (nm)
X-position
Y-position
Z-position

3.6
2.7
–2
Gas flow (L/min)
Cool
Auxiliary
Sample
16
0.9
1.095
Plasma Power (W)
600
Lenses (V)
Extraction
Focus
X-deflection
Shape
Y-deflection

–2000
–1030
6.15
134
–6.25
High-resolution lenses (V)
Quad 1
Quad 2
Quad 3
Quad 4
–2.67
–2.77
–11.05
2.5

Table I: Optimal cool plasma operating conditions used in this study.

Detection limits are a function of instrument sensitivity and stability, contamination levels, interference in the sampling and analysis processes, and the dilution factor of the sample. Sodium (Na), magnesium (Mg), aluminum (Al), calcium (Ca), and zinc (Zn) are common environmental contaminants. Several polyatomic species interfere with the detection of phosphorus (P), potassium (K), Ca, and iron (Fe). Arsenic (As) can be difficult to ionize and suffers from interferences from argon chloride. Microsampling techniques allow for a reduction in detection limits by decreasing the sample size. Not all of the analytes listed are soluble in the same VPD solution. Consequently, in the study discussed here, different kinds of VPD solutions were used to obtain the results.

Table II lists element detection limits that were achieved using the HR-ICP-MS instrument equipped with a 50-µl PFA microflow nebulizer and 750 µl of scanning solution. Both 600-W and normal 1200-W plasma tunes were utilized to optimize the detection of the various analytes. In addition, several kinds of VPD solutions were used in the analyses because the elements listed are not all soluble in the same solution.6

Analyte Element
and Isotope
Resolution
Plasma (W)
Results (atoms/cm2)
Instrument Detection
Limit (atoms/cm2)
7Li
Low
600
<DL
3 x 108
23Na
Low
600
1 x 108
1 x 108
24Mg
Low
600
2 x 108
5 x 107
27Al
Low
600
1 x 1010
2 x 108
39K
Medium
600
<DL
1 x 108
44Ca
Medium
1200
2 x109
8 x 107
52Cr
Medium
600
<DL
6 x 106
56Fe
Medium
600
2 x 108
6 x 107
58Ni
Medium
600
<DL
2 x 108
63Cu
Medium
600
1 x 109
4 x 107
68Zn
Medium
600
8 x 108
2 x 107
31P
Medium
1200
3 x 1010
2 x 109
48Ti
Medium
1200
<DL
7 x 107
55Mn
Low
600
<DL
2 x 107
75As
Medium
1200
<DL
2 x 108
181Ta
Low
1200
<DL
4 x 107
182W
Low
1200
<DL
2 x 107
194Pt
Low
600
<DL
5 x 107
208Pb
Low
1200
<DL
1 x 107
Table II: VPD HR-ICP-MS results and detection limits (DLs) using a 50-µl microflow nebulizer and a 750-µl drop of scanning solution.

The comparable data in Table III show that using a 20-µl PFA microflow nebulizer resulted in even lower detection limits than were achieved with the 50-µl unit. To keep the dilution factor at a minimum, 100 µl of scanning solution were used in these analyses. While lower detection limits may be possible with the 50-µl nebulizer, attempts to use that unit with a solution volume of <100 µl led to inconsistent scanning and recovery results.

Analyte Element
and Isotope
Resolution
Plasma (W)
Results (atoms/cm2)
Instrument Detection
Limit (atoms/cm2)
7Li
Low
600
<DL
6.5 x 106
23Na
Low
600
2.8 x 107
5.8 x 106
24Mg
Low
600
<DL
1.4 x 106
27Al
Low
600
1.7 x 108
5.7 x 106
39K
Medium
600
3.2 x 108
3.9 x 106
44Ca
Medium
600
1.7 x 108
2.2 x 107
52Cr
Medium
600
6.3 x 107
2.5 x106
56Fe
Medium
600
2.7 x 108
3.0 x 106
58Ni
Medium
600
3.5 x 107
2.0 x 107
63Cu
Low
600
1.2 x 108
2.3 x 106
68Zn
Low
600
3.1 x 107
4.1 x 106
Table III: VPD HR-ICP-MS VPD results and detection limits (DLs) using a 20-µl microflow nebulizer and 100 µl of scanning solution.

Using VPD HR-ICP-MS for Copper Contamination Analysis

Copper metallization in processes such as damascene interconnect architecture are increasingly being used in IC manufacturing. While copper is useful for optimizing device performance, it also can be a source of contamination that decreases minority carrier lifetimes, roughens the wafer surface as a result of fast oxidation, and leads to increased dielectric leakage through ionic and atomic diffusion mechanisms.7 Therefore, the accurate and timely measurement of contamination resulting from copper processing is critical to device yields.

The rough surface of the wafer backside serves as a gettering agent for metals and is an obstacle to TXRF analysis, since rough surfaces scatter and reflect x-rays.8 In contrast, VPD ICP-MS and VPD HR-ICP-MS sample preparation does not require a flat or smooth surface, making these combination techniques well suited for the identification of both front- and backside copper contamination.

The accuracy of copper or other contamination measurements taken in a high-silicon matrix can be affected by polyatomic interferences. Because VPD scanning solutions may contain Si levels of between a few hundred and a few thousand parts per million, polyatomic Si interferences may be of concern.9 However, Figure 1 illustrates how using the appropriate resolution can overcome Si interference and enable an accurate quantification of copper contaminants. The cool plasma conditions listed in Table I were used for these analyses, along with a medium (R = 4000) resolution setting. Comparable results with low (R = 300) resolution were 439 and 100 ppt for 65Cu and 63Cu, respectively, which would suggest that an interference was causing falsely high readings.

Identifying Contamination in Process Chambers with VPD HR-ICP-MS

Used to create thin films on the wafer surface, CVD processes are performed in chambers that are made out of 27Al, which makes it necessary to monitor postprocess aluminum contamination on wafer surface layers. For example, aluminum particles from a CVD chamber may appear in BPSG, a boron- and phosphorus-doped silicon dioxide insulating layer, but analysis of this film poses several challenges. The interference issues associated with samples that contain high levels of silicon apply in this case, and it is also difficult to quantify aluminum in a matrix with high levels of boron, since there was a concern that 11B16O may interfere with 27Al. To address this issue, an experiment was devised to determine if boron oxide interfered with aluminum analysis in BPSG films when analyzed by quadrupole VPD ICP-MS.

To show the sensitivity of the HR-ICP-MS instrument, a DI-water sample spiked with 75 ppt of 27Al was analyzed, using cool (600-W) plasma and medium (R = 4000) resolution. Those results are shown in Figure 2. Next, a low-resolution (R = 300) analysis of a BPSG film was performed in hot (1200-W) plasma. As shown in Figure 3, this analysis resulted in a false high result for 27Al of 19 ppb, indicating that there was interference from 11B16O. To resolve the aluminum peak from the 11B16O peak, another HR-ICP-MS analysis was run, using a 1200-W plasma and medium resolution. This analysis, shown in Figure 4, resulted in a concentration of 7 ppb 27Al.

Figure 2: Analysis of a 75-ppt 27Al spike in a DI-water background performed with cool plasma and medium resolution. This test result shows the capability of the HR-ICP-MS instrument to quantify 27Al at low levels.

Figure 3: Analytical results showing boron oxide interference with 27Al in a BPSG matrix. The analysis was done using hot plasma and low resolution.


Figure 4: Resolution of boron oxide from 27Al. The analysis was done using hot plasma and medium resolution.

Because it is standard practice at Micron Technology (Boise, ID) to analyze 27Al with a quadrupole ICP-MS in cool plasma, an additional test was run to determine if boron interference was an issue under cool plasma conditions. The resulting data suggest that 11B16O does not form in cool plasma. As seen in Figure 5, the same sample that yielded a result of 7 ppb 27Al in hot plasma exhibited a concentration of 6 ppb 27Al in cool plasma using medium resolution. To further investigate the theory that the boron oxide will not form in cool plasma, analyses of a different BPSG sample were performed in low-, medium-, and high-resolution modes using cool plasma. The resulting 27Al concentration levels of 2666, 2636, and 2658 ppt, respectively, confirmed the hypothesis.

Figure 5: Medium-resolution scan of the sample depicted in Figure 4, performed using cool plasma. This result indicates that boron oxide does not form in cool plasma.

Diffusion chambers are also sources of aluminum contamination, which in this case may be difficult to analyze accurately because the 27Al peak resides so close to the 28Si peak in a high-silicon matrix. Figure 6 indicates that when HR-ICP-MS is used with cool or hot plasma, even a large 28Si peak will not overlap with the 27Al peak. In the hot plasma analysis, the 28Si peak overranged the detector, but no resolution of aluminum and silicon was needed under either condition.

Using VPD HR-ICP-MS to Analyze Nonmetallic Contamination

During ion implantation of boron and phosphorus, common dopants used in the IC fabrication process, the surface of the wafer is bombarded, creating the potential for residual contamination. Traditionally, identification of such nonmetallic contaminants has been accomplished using ion chromatography and surface techniques such as secondary ionization mass spectrometry and Auger electron spectroscopy.10,11 Boron also can be measured by ICP-MS or HR-ICP-MS, but accurate determination of trace levels of phosphorus can be a problem. Phosphorus requires hot plasma conditions for ionization, but 14N16O1H forms under such conditions and creates interference that may prevent the quantification of 31P. However, the low-level quantification of 31P in an oxide film is attainable by using HR-ICP-MS with medium (R = 4000) resolution. Other low-level analytical results for 31P in oxide films that were achieved in this study included 1.5 x 1010 atoms/cm2 for a 1000-Å thermal oxide film and 2.2 x 1011 and 3.6 x 1012 atoms/cm2 for similar films implanted with arsenic and phosphorus, respectively.

VPD HR-ICP-MS also is capable of determining low-level phosphorus carryover from phosphoric acid processing. Such data can be helpful in decreasing wafer rinse times, which can lead to reductions in water consumption and wafer processing times.12 The results in Table IV show the efficiency of various rinse times for the removal of the phosphoric acid residue from the entire wafer surface.

Conclusion

As the semiconductor industry continues to evolve to technology nodes with increasingly stringent contamination limits, the need for advanced analytical capabilities will increase. VPD, when combined with HR-ICP-MS, achieves timely results and interference resolution while offering superior detection limits for a large range of detectable analytes. The detection limits for VPD HR-ICP-MS are in the range of 106 atoms/cm2 for several critical elements. The detection of such elements as Al, P, K, Ca, Fe, and Cu is obscured by several matrix-induced polyatomic interferences, compromising the analytical quantitation capabilities of a quadrupole ICP-MS. However, HR-ICP-MS systems in medium or high-resolution mode can confirm interfering peaks and achieve accurate results.

Sample ID

Phosphorus (ppb)

Lab DI water
<0.050
Blank
0.108
H3PO4, 1-minute rinse
2980
H3PO4, 2-minute rinse
192
H3PO4, 3-minute rinse
14.2
H3PO4, 4-minute rinse
1.89
H3PO4, 5-minute rinse
0.602
H3PO4, 7-minute rinse
0.127
H3PO4, 9-minute rinse
0.097
H3PO4, 10-minute rinse
0.108

Table IV: Phosphorus concentrations in DI water, on a blank wafer, and on eight wafers processed with phosphoric acid and rinsed with DI water. Analyses were performed with VPD HR-ICP-MS and show the technique’s usefulness in optimizing rinse times.

Developed to meet the need for new techniques, the combination of VPD and magnetic sector HR-ICP-MS offers accurate and timely results, interference resolution, and detection limits that exceed those required by The International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors. Suitable for use with many analytes, the technique achieves detection limits in the range of 106 atoms/cm2 for several critical elements. In the cases of aluminum, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, iron, and copper, where several matrix-induced polyatomic interferences can compromise the analytical quantitation capabilities of a quadrupole ICP-MS, HR-ICP-MS systems in medium- or high-resolution modes enable investigators to confirm interfering peaks and ensure accurate results.


References

1. The International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (San Jose: Semiconductor Industry Association, 2001). Available from Internet, http://public.itrs.net.

2. MK Balazs, "Semiconductor Industry Benefits from ICP-MS," R&D Magazine (1995): 51–56.

3. G Buhrer, "Application of Vapor Phase Decomposition/Total Reflection X-Ray Fluorescence in the Silicon Semiconductor Manufacturing Environment," Spectrochimica Acta Part B 54, no. 10 (1999): 1399–1407.

4. L Vines et al., "Metal Contamination and Silicon Damage Effects of Oxide Plasma Etch Processes," in Proceedings of the Symposium on Contamination Control and Defect Reduction in Semiconductor Manufacturing (Pennington, NJ: The Electrochemical Society, 1994), 141–153.

5. L Mendicino et al., "Resource Conservation through Wet Cleans Optimization," in Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium of SCP Global Technologies (Boise, ID: SCP Global Technologies, 2001).

6. M Radle et al., "Characterizing Thermal Oxide Metals," Semiconductor International 24, no. 8 (2001): 217–224.

7. G Settembre and E Debrah, "Using VPD ICP-MS to Monitor Trace Metals on Unpatterned Wafer Surfaces," MICRO 16, no. 6 (1998), 79–89.

8. R Grieken and A Markowicz, Handbook of X-Ray Spectrometry (New York: Marcel Dekker, 1993), 454.

9. P Boon et al., "Copper Metallization." Available from Internet, http://courses.nus.edu.sg/course/phyweets/Projects98/CuMetal/.

10. RM Merrill, "Ion Chromatographic Determination of Boron and Phosphorus in Chemically Vapor-Deposited Borophosphosilicate Glass (BPSG) Films," LC-GC 6, no. 5 (1988): 416–419.

11. JC Tracy, Electron Emission Spectroscopy (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing, 1973), 295.

12. JA Weems, "Strategies for Water Reclamation at an Advanced Wafer Fab," in Proceedings of the Semiconductor Pure Water and Chemicals Conference (Santa Clara, CA: Semiconductor Pure Water and Chemicals Conference, 1997), 167–173.


David Palsulich is the trace analysis lab supervisor at Micron Technology (Boise, ID). He is responsible for the identification and implementation of trace analytical methods in support of the R&D and fabrication processes, drawing on his more than 7 years of experience in the area of trace inorganic analyses. He has a BS in chemistry from Albertson College in Caldwell, ID, and an MBA from Northwest Nazarene University in Nampa, ID. (Palsulich can be reached at 208/368-5299 or dpalsulich@micron.com.)

Kevin Coyle is a senior chemist in the trace analysis lab at Micron Technology, where he is responsible for R&D efforts. He has more than 10 years of analytical chemistry experience and 5 years of trace analytical experience. He received a BS in chemistry from the University of Nevada in Reno. (Coyle can be reached at 208/363-1715 or kmcoyle@micron.com.)


Larry Weston is a senior chemist in the trace analysis lab at Micron Technology, where he is responsible for the development and implementation of new procedures. He has been with the company for more than 7 years, 6 of which he has spent in the field of trace analysis. He received a BS in chemistry from Weber State University in Ogden, UT. (Weston can be reached at 208/368-1279 or lweston@micron.com.)

 


MicroHome | Search | Current Issue | MicroArchives
Buyers Guide | Media Kit

Questions/comments about MICRO Magazine? E-mail us at cheynman@gmail.com.

© 2007 Tom Cheyney
All rights reserved.