|
|
 |
Critical MaterialsChemicals
Implementing enhanced ICP-MS technology
to attain SEMI Grade 5 purity levels
Jean-Marie Collard, Solvay Interox;
Katsu Kawabata and Yoko Kishi, PerkinElmer Instruments;
and Robert Thomas, Scientific Solutions
Data generated at a chemical suppliers facility illustrate
that trace elements in hydrogen peroxide can be detected at the
proposed 10-ppt level using a new approach to ICP mass spectrometry.
As
integrated circuits become more compact and electronic devices
shrink, manufacturers of analytical instrumentation used by the
semiconductor industry are facing new challenges. Nowhere are
these challenges more obvious than in the area of instrumentation
for the analysis of the high-purity chemicals that are used in
various stages of the IC manufacturing process. To reduce costs
and increase per-wafer device yields, chip manufacturers are using
wafers with ever-larger diameters and ever-narrower linewidths,
which has led to a demand for ever-lower levels of trace-element
contamination in high-purity process chemicals.
While 10 years ago SEMI deemed that 10-ppb
purity levels were adequate for many chemicals, today 100-ppt
levels are typical, and for some of the more critical materials,
10-ppt levels are being proposed. A guideline for 3032%
hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)
of 100 ppt for 18 trace elements is in its final stages of approval,
after which it will go into the Book of SEMI Standards
(BOSS) as a Grade 4 specification.1,2 However,
because H2O2 is widely
used in semiconductor manufacturing, a next-generation (Grade
5) purity level of 10 ppt for 21 elements has already been proposed.
Traditionally, inductively coupled plasma
mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) has been the technique of choice for
ultralow trace-element determinations in high-purity chemicals.
It has been used
successfully to determine impurities at the 100-ppt (Grade 4)
level in hydrogen peroxide using SEMI methodology. Unfortunately,
it does not have the capability to detect all 21 trace metals
specified at the proposed H2O2
purity level of 10 ppt, even when various background reduction
techniques, such as the cool plasma approach, are implemented.
| Analyte Elementand Isotope |
Matrix or Solvent |
Interference Species |
| 39K |
H2O |
38ArH |
| 40Ca |
H2O |
40Ar |
| 44Ca |
HNO3 |
14N14N16O |
| 48Ti |
H2O |
16O16O16O |
| 56Fe |
H2O |
40Ar16O |
| 31P |
H2O |
15N16O |
| 34S |
H2O |
16O18O |
| 75As |
HCl |
40Ar35Cl |
| 51V |
HCl |
35Cl16O |
| 64Zn |
H2SO4 |
32S16O16O |
| 24Mg |
Organics |
12C12C |
| 52Cr |
Organics |
40Ar12C |
| 55Mn |
HNO3 |
40Ar15N |
|
|
Table I: Some common polyatomic combinations
that cause the interferences with analyte spectra seen in
traditional ICP-MS.
|
To meet that challenge, a new approach
to improving ICP-MS detection limits has been developed. Known
as dynamic reaction cell (DRC) technology, this approach utilizes
ion-molecule chemistry to eliminate many argon- and solvent-based
interferences, thereby improving ICP-MS detection limits and background
equivalent concentrations (BECs) for the problematic elements.3
BEC is defined as the apparent concentration for
the background signal based on the sensitivity of an element at
a specified mass. The lower the BEC value, the more easily a signal
generated by the element can be discerned from the background.
It is widely believed that the BEC is a more accurate indicator
than detection limits for measuring the performance of an ICP-MS
system for each element of interest.
After reviewing the use of hydrogen peroxide
in the semiconductor industry, this article describes the dynamic
reaction cell technology in detail and explains how its use leads
to detection limit and BEC improvements. Data collected by Solvay
Interox, a global supplier of high-purity chemicals based in Brussels,
are presented showing that detection limits and spike recoveries
at the Grade 5 level in 31% hydrogen peroxide have been achieved
using DRC ICP-MS and the methodology specified by SEMI.
Hydrogen Peroxide in the Semiconductor
Industry
Because hydrogen peroxide comes in contact
with wafers during several steps in the semiconductor manufacturing
process, it must be extremely clean. It is usually mixed with
other chemicals, such as ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH),
hydrochloric acid (HCl), and sulfuric acid (H2SO4),
which are used to dissolve metals from the wafer surface or to
build a silicon dioxide layer on top of the silicon substrate.
Since extremely large quantities of these chemical mixtures are
used, there has always been a very stringent purity requirement
for the H2O2 supplied
to the industry. In addition, whenever SEMI seeks to lower contamination
levels in order to improve device yields, hydrogen peroxide is
always in the first group of chemicals to be evaluated. For these
reasons, SEMI is investigating the possibility of lowering the
maximum contamination level from 100 to 10 ppt for 21 elements.
|
|
|
Figure 1: ICP-MS sensitivity for a selected
group of elements in different HNO3 concentrations under
(a) cool plasma conditions (800 W of RF power, 1.5 L/min
of nebulizer gas) and (b) hot plasma conditions (1600 W
of RF power, 1 L/min of nebulizer gas).
|
Solvay Interox was among the first chemical
suppliers to utilize ICP-MS for monitoring ultralow trace-metal
contamination levels. However, the company soon realized that
even under cool plasma conditions, there were a number of critical
elements, such as iron, calcium, and potassium, that ICP-MS could
not detect at very low levels. Many other chemical suppliers that
used ICP-MS also discovered its limitations. Some of them tried
to overcome those limitations by using simple preconcentration
methods, while others invested in such detection-enhancing techniques
as electrothermal vaporization ICP-MS, magnetic sectorhigh
resolution ICP-MS, and, more recently, collision cell ICP-MS.46
But although these alternative approaches offered some improvement,
their users still could not achieve the 10-ppt-level contamination
data for all 21 elements being proposed by SEMI.
When DRC ICP-MS was introduced in 1999
and data were presented on its successful use with semiconductor
process chemicals, Solvay Interox decided to investigate the technology's
potential for the analysis of Grade 5 H2O2.
The results of an early study had revealed that for many key elements,
particularly boron, the background levels on the DRC were significantly
lower than those with traditional ICP-MS instrumentation. After
lengthy evaluation, the chemical supplier invested in a DRC-based
instrument, the ELAN 6100 DRC from PerkinElmer SCIEX Instruments
(Concord, ON, Canada), in early 2001. The data generated by that
instrumentation are presented later in this article.
Alternative Background Reduction Techniques
When a traditional quadrupole ICP-MS instrument
operates under normal plasma conditions (typically 1000 W of RF
power and 1.0 L/min of nebulizer gas flow), argon ions combine
with matrix- and solvent-based ions (hydrogen, oxygen, chlorine,
nitrogen, sulfur, carbon, etc.) to generate polyatomic spectral
species that interfere with the analysis of many analyte ions.
Table I lists some typical examples. There are several approaches
to reduce such spectral interferences. The first major breakthrough
came in the mid-1990s with the commercialization of the cool,
or cold, plasma approach. This technology, first reported in the
literature in the late 1980s, uses a reduced-temperature plasma
to minimize the formation of the troublesome polyatomic ions.7
|
|
|
Figure 2: Schematic illustrating how DRC
technology reduces the spectral interference of 40Ar16O
on 56Fe.
|
Under cool plasma conditions (500800
W of RF power and a 1.51.8-L/min nebulizer gas flow), ionization
reactions in the plasma are changed in such a manner that many
of the typical polyatomic interferences are reduced. The result
is that detection limits are improved for a number of critical
semiconductor elements, including iron, potassium, and calcium.8
However, because the cool plasma contains much less energy than
normal, high-temperature plasma, the instrument's sensitivity
for the majority of elements can be severely affected by the sample
matrix. This inherent weakness of the cool plasma approach can
be seen by comparing Figure 1a, which shows the sensitivity for
a selected group of elements in varying concentrations of nitric
acid under cool plasma conditions, and Figure 1b, which shows
the sensitivity for the same group of elements under hot plasma
conditions. With the cool plasma, analyte sensitivity decreased
dramatically as the acid concentration increased, whereas under
hot plasma conditions, the sensitivity for most of the elements
varied only slightly with changes in acid concentration.
The variation in instrument performance
under cool plasma conditions may make it necessary to use standard
additions or matrix matching to achieve satisfactory results.
Additionally, obtaining the most accurate results for a multielement
analysis often requires the use of two sets of operating conditionsone
for the elements that can be detected at lower levels under cool
plasma conditions and another for the other elementswhich can
be a very time-consuming and cumbersome process.
|
|
|
Figure 3: Spectral scans of varying concentrations
of iron. Virtually no signal intensity can be seen at mass
56 for doubly DI water (DDIW), which indicates there is
very little background interference.
|
Another major development in reducing ICP-MS
polyatomic spectral interferences employs a multipole (typically
a hexapole or octapole) housed within a cell that is placed upstream
of the analyzer quadrupole.9 The flow of gas, typically
hydrogen or helium, within this cell stimulates ion-molecule collisions
that convert the ions associated with spectral interference to
noninterfering species. After passing through the collision cell,
the sample is directed to the quadrupole analyzer for normal mass
separation. Although this technology initially showed great promise
for use with process chemicals, it did not reduce background levels
low enough to significantly improve detection limits for such
problematic elements as iron, potassium, and calcium over the
cool plasma approach.
DRC Principles of Operation
The need to continue to improve ICP-MS
detection limits for semiconductor-related elements led to the
development of DRC technology.10 Similar in appearance
to the collision cell, the dynamic reaction cell is a pressurized
multipole positioned upstream of the analyzer quadrupole. However,
this is where the similarity of the two techniques ends. In DRC
technology, the upstream cell contains a quadrupole instead of
a hexapole or octapole, and a reactive gas such as ammonia is
bled into this cell, which causes ion-molecule interactions. By
a number of different mechanisms, which are predominantly reactions
and not just collisions, the gaseous molecules convert the potentially
interfering ions into species that will not interfere with the
analyte during the subsequent conventional mass separation in
the analyzer quadrupole.
The advantage of using a quadrupole in
the reaction cell is that the stability regions are much better
defined than with a hexapole or octapole, allowing precise control
of the chemical reactions that take place within the cell. Unwanted
reaction by-products that could potentially lead to new interferences
are prevented via optimization of the quadrupole's electrical
fields. This cleansing process, known as chemical resolution,
means that every time a sample enters the reaction cell, the bandpass
of the quadrupole is optimized for the specific interference problem
associated with the first analyte of interest; it is then changed
on the fly for the next analyte.
This chemical resolution process is depicted
schematically in Figure 2 for one of the most common problems
in ICP-MS, the polyatomic interference of 40Ar16O
on the determination of 56Fe. In this example, the
reaction gas (NH3) that is bled into the
reaction cell reacts with the 40Ar16O in
the sample matrix to form new species that will not interfere
with 56Fe, but does not react with the 56Fe.
When the flow of the reaction gas is optimized, the chemical cleansing
process is so thorough that the background from the 40Ar16O
is virtually eliminated. This is exemplified in Figure 3, which
shows a spectral scan of varying concentrations of iron. It can
be seen that the background signal contribution at mass 56 for
DI water is less than 10 counts per second. If no reaction gas
had been used in the cell, the background would have been five
to six orders of magnitude higher. Figure 4 indicates that with
the ultralow 40Ar16O background, DRC ICP-MS
can achieve a detection limit for 56Fe of <0.2 ppt,
which is significantly lower than that achieved for ICP-MS with
a collision cell.
|
|
|
Figure 4: ICP-MS iron detection as a function
of gas flow in a reduction cell. By optimizing the flow
of reaction gas, the 40Ar16O background
can be reduced to such a level that a detection limit of
<0.2 ppt is achievable.
|
In addition to its effectiveness for iron
analysis, the DRC approach has achieved background reductions
for other common polyatomic ions that cause spectral interference,
including 40Ar on the determination of 40Ca
and 38Ar1H on the determination of 39K.
Using the technology, detection limits for both these elements
can be reduced to better than 1 ppt.
| Elementand Isotope |
Detection Limit (ppt) |
BEC (ppt) |
Element and Isotope |
Detection Limit (ppt) |
| BEC (ppt) |
| 7Li |
0.26 |
0.22 |
74Ge |
0.58 |
0.57 |
| 9Be |
1.00 |
0.87 |
75As |
0.48 |
1.60 |
| 11B |
3.60 |
7.10 |
88Sr |
0.03 |
0.02 |
| 23Na |
0.20 |
0.22 |
90Zr |
0.05 |
0.04 |
| 24Mg |
0.23 |
0.18 |
98Mo |
0.11 |
0.12 |
| 27Al |
0.23 |
0.42 |
107Ag |
0.09 |
0.10 |
| 39K |
0.27 |
2.60 |
114Cd |
0.08 |
0.11 |
| 40Ca |
0.27 |
0.63 |
115In |
0.03 |
0.02 |
| 48Ti |
0.92 |
1.70 |
120Sn |
0.12 |
0.88 |
| 51V |
0.12 |
0.04 |
121Sb |
0.08 |
0.08 |
| 52Cr |
0.14 |
0.29 |
138Ba |
0.06 |
0.04 |
| 55Mn |
0.17 |
0.54 |
181Ta |
0.06 |
0.02 |
| 56Fe |
0.49 |
2.60 |
184W |
0.07 |
0.07 |
| 60Ni |
0.43 |
0.66 |
197Au |
0.15 |
0.05 |
| 59Co |
0.04 |
0.04 |
205Tl |
0.02 |
0.01 |
| 63Cu |
0.06 |
0.68 |
208Pb |
0.07 |
0.09 |
| 64Zn |
0.63 |
1.20 |
209Bi |
0.02 |
0.01 |
| 69Ga |
0.06 |
0.05 |
238U |
0.02 |
0.01 |
|
|
Table II: Typical multielement detection
limits and background equivalent concentrations achieved
with the DRC approach. The data for the elements in red
were obtained using a reaction gas, while those for the
elements in black were obtained with the DRC ICP-MS instrument
in standard mode.
|
Unlike the cool plasma approach, DRC ICP-MS
uses a normal-temperature plasma, which means that elements with
high ionization potential can be determined with no sacrifice
in sensitivity. Therefore, many of the other problematic interferences,
such as 40Ar40Ar on 80Se and
40Ar35Cl on 75As, are relatively
straightforward to overcome. DRC also can be used without a reaction
gas for the determination of elements that do not suffer from
polyatomic spectral interferences. In that mode, the cell is used
as an ion-focusing guide rather than to carry out ion-molecule
reactions. Table II presents some typical multielement detection
limits and BECs achieved with the technology. The data for the
elements in red were obtained using a reaction gas, while the
data for the elements in black were obtained with the ICP-MS instrument
in standard mode. All results were achieved using a 1-second integration
time; further detection limit improvements may be achieved using
longer integration times in the single-element mode.
|
Data Required
|
Explanation
|
| Unspiked sample A result |
Average of five replicates |
| Unspiked sample B result |
Average of five replicates |
| Unspiked sample average |
Average of results A and B |
| Spiked |
The amount of spike should be
equivalent to 50% of the specified value
of the trace impurity; the spike should
be
added to the sample prior to any
other sample preparation |
| Spiked sample C result |
Average of five replicates |
| Spiked sample D result |
Average of five replicates |
| Recovery 1 |
Result C average of
results A and B |
| % recovery 1 |
(Recovery 1/spike) * 100 |
| Recovery 2 |
Result D average of results A
and B |
| % recovery 2 |
(Recovery 2/spike) ¥
100 |
| % recovery range |
Maximum % recovery minimum
% recovery |
| % RSD |
Relative standard deviation of five
replicates for
each spiked sample (RSD/spike ¥
100) |
Table III: Reporting requirements specified
by SEMI for spike recovery data.
|
| Figure of Merit |
Criteria for Successful Analysis
|
| Measurement accuracy Between |
75 and 125% spike recovery
for each spiked sample |
| Method precision |
Recovery range is ≤35% |
| Measurement precision |
RSD on repetitive measurement
at spike level is ≤20% |
| Method detection limit MDL |
MDL cannot exceed the SEMI
limit when estimated per the SEMI guideline12
|
|
| Table IV: Criteria that determine
the suitability of an analytical technique for generating
spike recovery data. |
|
Parameter
|
Value
|
|
RF power
|
1400 W
|
|
Plasma gas flow
|
17 L/min
|
|
Auxiliary gas flow
|
1.5 L/min
|
|
Nebulizer gas flow
|
1.05 L/min
|
|
Sample uptake rate
|
0.25 ml/min
|
|
Measurement protocol
|
1 point/mass
|
|
Integration time
|
1 sec/mass
|
|
Replicates
|
5
|
|
| Table V: Instrumental parameters
used for the analysis of ultra-high-purity hydrogen peroxide.
|
Achieving SEMI Specifications
The conversion of a proposed SEMI guideline
for process chemical purity to an industry standard depends on
the generation of analytical data showing that it is possible
to achieve a spike recovery between 75 and 125% at 50% of the
proposed specification using SEMI methodology and existing instrumentation.
Only when this capability is established will a guideline be published
in the BOSS as a specification.
|
Element
and Isotope
|
Reaction Cell
Gas Flow (ml/min)
|
|
7Li
|
0.0
|
|
11B
|
0.0
|
|
23Na
|
0.0
|
|
24Mg
|
0.0
|
|
27Al
|
0.6
|
|
39K
|
0.6
|
|
1.0
|
|
40Ca
|
|
48Ti
|
0.3
|
|
51V
|
0.3
|
|
52Cr
|
0.6
|
|
55Mn
|
0.6
|
|
56Fe
|
0.6
|
|
59Co
|
0.3
|
|
60Ni
|
0.3
|
|
63Cu
|
0.0
|
|
64Zn
|
0.0
|
|
75As
|
0.0
|
|
118Sn
|
0.0
|
|
121Sb
|
0.0
|
|
138Ba
|
0.0
|
|
208Pb
|
0.0
|
|
|
Table VI: Reaction cell gas flows used for
the analysis of ultra-high-purity hydrogen peroxide.
|
For any instrumental technique to comply
with SEMI requirements, the analytical data must meet very stringent
validation criteria, which are based on analyzing two unspiked
samples and two spiked samples. Table III lists the data-reporting
requirements.11 The data generated are then evaluated
based on certain performance criteria, which are summarized in
Table IV.
The early spike recovery and detection
level data generated for Grade 5 H2O2
at Solvay Interox have revealed that DRC ICP-MS technology can
satisfy these SEMI requirements.13 The ELAN 6100 instrument,
which has been installed in a Class 100 cleanroom, was used to
generate these data. The main instrumental parameters are shown
in Table V, and the reaction cell gas flows for each element are
listed in Table VI. The instrument's spray chamber is quartz cyclonic,
the microconcentric nebulizer is made from PFA, the sample injector
is quartz, and the interface cones are platinum.
Calibration was performed with a 100-ppt
multielement standard made by diluting a commercial stock solution
in ultrapure water (UPW) and adding 1% nitric acid (HNO3).
The 31% ultra-high-purity H2O2
was injected directly into the instrument using a PFA-100 microconcentric
nebulizer (ESI; Omaha, NE). The method detection limit (MDL) was
calculated from linear regression of a calibration curve generated
from two sets of H2O2
samples spiked with 0, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 ppt of each analyte
element.
A summary of the data for the 21 elements
included in the proposed Grade 5 specification is given in Table
VII. (Although a UPW blank also was analyzed, the data in
this table have not been blank subtracted.) It can be seen that
the criteria for success listed in Table IV were met for every
element. The enhanced detection capability of the DRC ICP-MS technology
enabled all the elements to be measured at the 10-ppt level, a
performance that could not have been achieved with conventional
ICP-MS technology. Although this study has focused on hydrogen
peroxide, the results are typical of those for additional process
chemicals that other researchers have analyzed with the DRC technology.14
To keep pace with the increasingly stringent
requirements of the semiconductor industry, analytical instrumentation
must undergo continual improvement. In the area of high-purity
process chemicals, ICP-MS is routinely used for trace-element
analysis. However, to reach next-generation purity levels, the
detection capabilities of ICP-MS must be improved. This study
focused on one such detection-enhancing approach called DRC technology,
in which the sample passes through a cell in which ion-molecule
reactions occur. By the process of chemical resolution, these
reactions convert interfering ions into species that do not interfere
with the analysis, thereby improving the spectrometer's detection
limits. The results reported in this article illustrate the ability
of DRC ICP-MS technology to analyze hydrogen peroxide at the proposed
SEMI Grade 5 purity level.
01.
SEMI C30-0600Specifications and Guidelines for Hydrogen Peroxide
(San Jose: SEMI, 2000).
02.
Book of SEMI Standards (BOSS) (San Jose: SEMI, updated
periodically).
03.
SD Tanner and VI Baranov, "Theory, Design and Operation of a Dynamic
Reaction Cell for ICP-MS," Atomic Spectroscopy 20, no.
2 (1999): 4552.
04.
S Beres et al., "The Benefits of Electrothermal Vaporization for
Minimizing Interferences in ICP-MS," Spectroscopy 9, no.
1 (1994): 2026.
05.
D Potter et al., "Ultratrace Analysis of Semiconductor Grade Chemicals
by ICP-MS," Analytical Sciences 7 (1991): 467470.
06.
I Feldman et al., "Application of a Hexapole Collision and Reaction
Cell in ICP-MS. Part 2. Analytical Figures of Merit and First
Applications," Fresnius Journal of Analytical Chemistry
365 (1999): 422428.
07.
SJ Jiang, RS Houk, and MA Stevens, "Alleviation of Overlap Interferences
for Determination of Potassium Isotope Ratios by Inductively Coupled
Plasma Mass Spectrometry," Analytical Chemistry 60, no.
11 (1988): 12171221.
08.
SD Tanner et al., "The Application of Cold Plasma Conditions for
the Determination of Trace Levels of Fe, Ca, K, Na, and Li by
ICP-MS," Atomic Spectroscopy 16, no. 1 (1995): 1618.
09.
P Turner et al., "Interface Studies in the ICP-Mass Spectrometer,"
in Plasma Source Mass Spectrometry: Developments and Applications,
eds. JG Holland and SD Tanner (London: Royal Society of Chemistry,
1997).
11. SEMI C1-1000Specifications for
Reagents, Section 3.14: Method Validation (San Jose: SEMI,
2000).
12. SEMI C10-0299Guide for Determination
of Method Detection Limits (San Jose: SEMI, 1999).
13. JM Collard, Y Kishi, and C Costanza,
"Analytical Method Validation in the Semiconductor Industry Applied
to High Purity Hydrogen Peroxide," in Proceedings of the Semiconductor
Pure Water and Chemicals Conference (San Jose: SPWCC, 2001),
190213.
14. DS Bollinger and AJ Schleisman, "Analysis
of High Purity Acids Using a Dynamic Reaction Cell ICP-MS," Atomic
Spectroscopy 20, no. 2 (1999): 6063.
Jean-Marie
Collard, PhD, is the inorganic analysis
unit manager for Solvay Interox, based at its corporate research
and technology center in Brussels. He was instrumental in setting
up the company's first ICP-MS cleanroom facility in Brussels in
1991. He moved to its Deer Park facility in Houston in 1997, where
he became the laboratory group leader of the semiconductor-grade
hydrogen peroxide business unit. His main responsibilities included
setting up a Class 100/10 cleanroom containing two ICP mass spectrometers
and running the analytical and process development program. Collard
received a BS in chemistry, an MS in analytical chemistry, and
a PhD in analytical and nuclear chemistry from the University
of Liege, Belgium. (Collard can be reached at +32 2 2643249 or
jean-marie.collard@solvay.com.)
Katsu
Kawabata is the semiconductor business development specialist
for PerkinElmer Instruments based at the company's SCIEX facility
in Concord, ON, Canada, where he is responsible for developing
DRC ICP-MS business. Before joining the company, he served as
the ICP-MS research and development applications manager for Yokogawa
Analytical Systems (Tokyo), where he was well known for his work
on the shield torch system and its application to the analysis
of semiconductor-related materials. He received a chemistry degree
from the technical college in Kobe, Japan, in 1976. (Kawabata
can be reached at 905/660-9005 or katsu.kawabata@sciex.com.)
Yoko
Kishi is the ICP-MS product specialist for the semiconductor
business unit of PerkinElmer Instruments. She is based at the
SCIEX facility, where she is responsible for semiconductor applications
development using DRC technology. For 14 years she held various
ICP-MS applications and marketing positions at Yokogawa Analytical
Systems. She received a BA in analytical chemistry from Keio University
in Tokyo. (Kishi can be reached at 905/660-9005 or
yoko.kishi@sciex.com.)
Robert
Thomas is principal of Scientific Solutions (Gaithersburg,
MD), a consulting company that serves the scientific community.
He has worked in the field of trace-element analysis for more
than 30 years and has more than 15 years of experience in ICP
mass spectrometry. He has published 35 technical articles and
papers covering a wide variety of scientific topics. He received
a degree in analytical chemistry from Gwent College in Wales,
UK. (Thomas can be reached at 301/570-2811 or thomasrj@bellatlantic.net.
|

MicroHome |
Search | Current Issue | MicroArchives
Buyers Guide | Media Kit
Questions/comments about MICRO Magazine? E-mail us at cheynman@gmail.com.
© 2007 Tom Cheyney
All rights reserved.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|